- #Remotepc bank of america pro
- #Remotepc bank of america software
- #Remotepc bank of america plus
- #Remotepc bank of america windows
#Remotepc bank of america pro
In comparison, TeamViewer’s Corporate license costs $1,498.80/year for just three concurrent sessions (although there’s no device limit), while LogMeIn’s Pro Plan costs $1,519.99/year for only 10 devices. RemotePC’s Team plan ($249.50/year) allows for unlimited concurrent connections to 50 devices, which is more than enough for most SMBs. We were also disappointed to see that it used 25% of our test computer’s 2.6 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i7 processor, which was several times greater than TeamViewer or LogMeIn. LogMeIn, however, fell behind in this category, with a generally laggier experience. We experienced little to no lag with either: mouse tracking was smooth, as were most animations, and clicks were carried from client to host nearly instantaneously. TeamViewer and RemotePC both performed well in terms of latency and system resources. Finally, LogMeIn didn’t do a great job of scaling displays, which could be blurry. Additionally, all three web apps are limited, so you’ll need desktop or mobile version for tasks such as file transfers or remote printing.
There are some notable exceptions: We found the RemotePC iOS app a bit clumsy, sometimes highlighting text without meaning to or scrolling too far due to oversensitivity. Session functions like chat, whiteboard, and recording were equally easy to find and use.
#Remotepc bank of america plus
The interfaces are quite similar: a main dashboard gives you access to devices associated with your account(s), plus additional features like user management and meetings. We found all three apps straightforward and easy to use. While both RemotePC and LogMeIn have some great features, TeamViewer ticks all the boxes in terms of compatibility, collaborative tools, and business integration.
#Remotepc bank of america software
Finally, TeamViewer supports hardware and software integration, beyond that provided by RemotePC’s simpler API, to integrate with your business’s existing IT solutions. Fortunately, all three apps support tools to facilitate user management, including user groups and permission settings, and can be remotely deployed en-mass using Group Policy Management or similar script-running tools. TeamViewer supports many different devices (Image credit: Teamviewer)ĭeployment and user management can be complicated and time consuming. While other software can certainly provide these functions, it’s nice to have everything in one place. In a similar vein, we were happy to see that TeamViewer includes a range of meeting and presentation features, like scheduling, shared calendars, and screens-sharing with up to 15 people. While all three apps support instant chat, only RemotePC and TeamViewer support voice and video chat, which we felt gave them a real advantage.
#Remotepc bank of america windows
RemotePC and LogMeIn enable users to access macOS and Windows hosts, but if you need to access mobile, internet of things (IoT), or point of sale (POS) devices, TeamViewer is the only one capable (although LogMeIn supports updating POS devices).Ĭollaborative tools are essential to running a business smoothly. We’ll look at a number of criteria, including compatibility, price, ease of setup and use, performance, user support, and business tools.Įach product supports basic functionality like file system navigation, drag-and-drop file sharing, remote printing, and support for multiple monitors.Īll three applications have web apps, and also work on macOS, Windows, iOS/iPadOS and Android, while TeamViewer and RemotePC also support Linux.
In this article, we’ll compare LogMeIn (opens in new tab), TeamViewer (opens in new tab), and RemotePC (opens in new tab) to help you determine which is the best remote desktop software for your business. At the same time, you need to keep your data as safe as possible and manage employee access. The right remote desktop software for your business can provide greater flexibility and increase productivity.
0 kommentar(er)
